Capital Expenditures and Working Capital
Master the final components of Free Cash Flow: understanding how companies invest in long-term assets and manage day-to-day operating cash needs.
Learning Objectives
- Distinguish between maintenance and growth CapEx
- Estimate future capital expenditures using multiple approaches
- Understand working capital components and their cash impact
- Project working capital changes as a percentage of revenue growth
Capital Expenditures and Working Capital#
You've projected revenue and margins—now you understand how much operating profit the company will generate. But not all of that profit becomes Free Cash Flow. Two major items reduce cash available to investors: Capital Expenditures (CapEx) and Working Capital investments.
The Cash Conversion Challenge: A profitable company can still burn cash if it needs constant investment in equipment or if cash gets trapped in inventory and receivables. Understanding CapEx and working capital reveals the true cash-generating ability of a business.
Understanding Capital Expenditures#
Capital expenditures are investments in long-term assets: buildings, equipment, technology infrastructure, vehicles. Unlike operating expenses, CapEx is capitalized on the balance sheet and depreciated over time.
Maintenance CapEx vs. Growth CapEx#
This distinction is crucial for valuation:
| Type | Purpose | Impact on Value |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance CapEx | Replacing worn-out equipment, keeping facilities operational | Necessary to sustain current cash flows |
| Growth CapEx | Expanding capacity, opening new locations, new product lines | Should generate future returns |
Example: Retail Chain
Total CapEx: $500M
- Maintenance (store refurbishments, equipment): $200M
- Growth (30 new stores × $10M each): $300M
For valuation:
- Mature company: Focus on maintenance CapEx
- Growing company: Consider total CapEx but expect returns from growth portion
Companies Don't Split This for You
Most companies report total CapEx without breaking out maintenance vs. growth. You'll need to estimate. A rough rule: maintenance CapEx is often similar to depreciation expense, since both relate to replacing aging assets.
Approaches to Projecting CapEx#
Method 1: CapEx as % of Revenue#
The simplest approach—assume CapEx maintains a historical relationship to revenue.
| Year | Revenue | CapEx | CapEx % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $800M | $80M | 10.0% |
| 2022 | $920M | $88M | 9.6% |
| 2023 | $1,050M | $95M | 9.0% |
| 2024 | $1,150M | $92M | 8.0% |
Observation: CapEx intensity is declining. This could mean:
- The company is mature (less growth investment needed)
- It's under-investing (could hurt future growth)
- It's becoming more efficient
Projection: Use 7-8% of revenue going forward, unless there's reason to expect a change.
Method 2: CapEx as Multiple of Depreciation#
Since maintenance CapEx approximates depreciation, you can use this relationship:
| Scenario | CapEx : Depreciation | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| CapEx < Depreciation | < 1.0x | Under-investing (may hurt future) |
| CapEx ≈ Depreciation | 1.0x | Maintaining capacity |
| CapEx > Depreciation | 1.5-2.0x | Investing for growth |
Example:
Current Depreciation: $50M
For a growing company: CapEx = $50M × 1.5 = $75M
For a mature company: CapEx = $50M × 1.1 = $55M
Method 3: Bottom-Up by Project#
For companies with visible investment programs:
Projected CapEx 2025:
- New factory in Texas: $200M (announced)
- IT infrastructure upgrade: $50M (planned)
- Maintenance across facilities: $80M (estimated)
- Total: $330M
This approach works well when companies disclose investment plans.
Industry CapEx Benchmarks#
Capital intensity varies dramatically by industry:
| Industry | Typical CapEx % of Revenue | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Software | 3-8% | Asset-light, minimal physical investment |
| Retail | 4-8% | Store buildouts, distribution centers |
| Manufacturing | 5-12% | Factories, equipment, tooling |
| Semiconductors | 15-30% | Expensive fabrication plants |
| Telecommunications | 15-25% | Network infrastructure |
| Utilities | 20-40% | Power plants, grid infrastructure |
Check Against Industry Norms
If a manufacturer projects 2% CapEx, ask why. Either they're under-investing or have an unusual asset-light model. If a software company projects 25% CapEx, something might be miscategorized.
Understanding Working Capital#
Working capital represents cash tied up in day-to-day operations. The key components:
Operating Working Capital Formula#
Operating Working Capital = Current Operating Assets - Current Operating Liabilities
Specifically:
= (Accounts Receivable + Inventory + Prepaid Expenses)
- (Accounts Payable + Accrued Expenses)
Note: Exclude cash and debt—those are financing, not operating items.
How Working Capital Uses (or Generates) Cash#
| If... | Working Capital | Cash Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Receivables increase | Increases | Uses cash (customers owe more) |
| Inventory increases | Increases | Uses cash (more product sitting) |
| Payables increase | Decreases | Generates cash (you owe suppliers more) |
The Golden Rule: Increases in working capital use cash; decreases generate cash.
Example: Growing Company's Working Capital#
Year 1: $100M revenue
- Receivables (60 days sales): $16.4M
- Inventory (45 days sales): $12.3M
- Payables (30 days): $8.2M
- Working Capital: $20.5M
Year 2: $120M revenue (20% growth)
- Receivables (same terms): $19.7M
- Inventory (same terms): $14.8M
- Payables (same terms): $9.9M
- Working Capital: $24.6M
Change in Working Capital: $24.6M - $20.5M = $4.1M (cash outflow)
This $4.1M is subtracted in the Free Cash Flow calculation—even though it's not an "expense," the cash is tied up.
Projecting Working Capital#
Method 1: Working Capital as % of Revenue#
The most common approach:
| Year | Revenue | Working Capital | WC % of Revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | $500M | $60M | 12.0% |
| 2023 | $600M | $72M | 12.0% |
| 2024 | $720M | $79M | 11.0% |
If WC is 11% of revenue and stays constant:
- When revenue grows from $720M to $800M
- Working capital goes from $79M to $88M
- Cash used = $9M
Formula for Forecasting:
Change in WC = WC % × (New Revenue - Old Revenue)
Change in WC = 11% × ($800M - $720M) = $8.8M
Method 2: Days-Based Analysis#
More precise but requires more data:
| Component | Days Outstanding | Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| Receivables | 45 days | Revenue ÷ 365 × 45 |
| Inventory | 60 days | COGS ÷ 365 × 60 |
| Payables | 40 days | COGS ÷ 365 × 40 |
This approach helps when you expect terms to change (e.g., company tightens credit).
Negative Working Capital: The Cash Machine#
Some businesses actually generate cash from working capital. This happens when:
| Scenario | Example |
|---|---|
| Customers pay upfront | SaaS subscriptions, insurance premiums |
| Inventory turns quickly | Grocery stores, fast fashion |
| Suppliers give long payment terms | Large retailers with negotiating power |
Example: Amazon-Like Retailer
- Customers pay immediately (credit card)
- Inventory turns in 20 days
- Pays suppliers in 60 days
Working Capital = Receivables (0) + Inventory (low) - Payables (high)
= Negative!
As revenue grows, working capital becomes MORE negative
= Cash generation from operations
Negative WC Advantage
Companies with negative working capital have a significant advantage: growth generates cash instead of consuming it. This is one reason Amazon could grow rapidly despite thin margins—customer cash flow funded expansion.
Putting It All Together: Free Cash Flow Build#
Let's complete the projection for TechCorp:
| Item | 2024A | 2025E | 2026E | 2027E | 2028E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Income | $104M | $140M | $201M | $271M | $329M |
| (-) Taxes (25%) | ($26M) | ($35M) | ($50M) | ($68M) | ($82M) |
| NOPAT | $78M | $105M | $151M | $203M | $247M |
| (+) Depreciation | $44M | $47M | $50M | $54M | $57M |
| (-) CapEx (4% of revenue) | ($59M) | ($62M) | ($67M) | ($72M) | ($75M) |
| (-) Δ Working Capital | ($7M) | ($9M) | ($12M) | ($12M) | ($9M) |
| Free Cash Flow | $56M | $81M | $122M | $173M | $220M |
Key assumptions:
- Tax rate: 25%
- Depreciation: ~3% of revenue, growing
- CapEx: 4% of revenue (CapEx > D&A indicates growth investment)
- Working Capital: 10% of revenue (change = 10% × revenue growth)
Common Mistakes#
1. Ignoring CapEx Entirely#
Some analysts project EBITDA as if it were cash flow. It's not. CapEx is real and recurring.
2. Projecting CapEx Below Depreciation Forever#
If CapEx stays below depreciation, the company is effectively shrinking its asset base. This can't continue indefinitely for most businesses.
3. Forgetting Working Capital in Growth#
Fast-growing companies often face "working capital squeeze"—profits look great, but cash is trapped in inventory and receivables. This has killed many seemingly healthy businesses.
4. Using Total Working Capital#
Remember: exclude cash and debt. Only operating working capital affects Free Cash Flow calculations.
Key Takeaways
- CapEx is investment in long-term assets; split mentally between maintenance and growth - Maintenance CapEx approximates depreciation; growth CapEx drives future expansion - Project CapEx using: % of revenue, multiple of depreciation, or bottom-up by project - Capital intensity varies wildly by industry (3% for software, 30%+ for utilities) - Working capital = cash tied up in receivables and inventory, minus payables - Increases in working capital use cash; decreases generate cash - Growth companies typically need working capital investment (cash outflow) - Some businesses (retail, SaaS) have negative working capital—growth generates cash - Always project changes in working capital, not absolute levels - Free Cash Flow = NOPAT + Depreciation - CapEx - Δ Working Capital