Intrinsic vs. Relative Valuation
Explore the two main schools of valuation: calculating intrinsic worth vs. comparing to peers.
Learning Objectives
- Define Intrinsic Valuation (DCF)
- Define Relative Valuation (Multiples)
- Compare the pros and cons of each approach
- Know when to use which method
Intrinsic vs. Relative Valuation#
There are two primary ways to determine what a company is worth. One looks inward at the company's cash generation, while the other looks outward at the market.
1. Intrinsic Valuation#
The Philosophy: An asset is worth the present value of the expected future cash flows it will generate.
The Primary Tool: Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis.
In this method, you don't care what the market thinks the stock is worth today. You build a model to forecast:
- How much cash the company will generate.
- How risky those cash flows are.
- What that cash is worth in today's dollars (Time Value of Money).
Analogy: The Rental Property#
You want to buy an apartment building. You don't look at Zillow to see what other buildings cost. Instead, you calculate:
- Rent collected per month ($2,000)
- Minus maintenance/taxes ($500)
- = Net Cash ($1,500)
- Value = The sum of that $1,500/month for the next 20 years. This is Intrinsic Valuation. You are valuing the cash, not the building.
Pros:
- Forces you to understand the business drivers (margins, growth, risk).
- Less influenced by market moods/bubbles.
- Focuses on the long-term fundamentals.
Cons:
- Highly sensitive to assumptions ("Garbage in, Garbage out").
- Requires more time and effort.
2. Relative Valuation#
The Philosophy: An asset is worth what similar assets are trading for in the market.
The Primary Tool: Pricing Multiples (e.g., P/E Ratio, EV/EBITDA, P/Sales).
In this method, you look at "comparable" companies (peers). If Company A trades at 20x earnings and Company B is similar but trades at 10x earnings, Company B might be "relatively" undervalued.
Analogy: House Shopping with Comps#
You want to buy a house. You look at what the 3 neighbors sold their houses for last month.
- Neighbor A (3 bed/2 bath): Sold for $400k.
- Neighbor B (3 bed/2 bath): Sold for $410k.
- Your Conclusion: This house is worth about $405k. This is Relative Valuation. You value the market price, not the cash flow.
Pros:
- Quick and easy to calculate.
- Reflects current market sentiment (useful for short-term trading).
- Requires fewer assumptions.
Cons:
- The "Bubble" Trap: If the whole neighborhood is overpriced (a housing bubble), relative valuation will tell you a house is "cheap" at $1M just because the neighbor sold for $1.1M. It won't tell you the house is intrinsically worthless.
- Finding truly "comparable" companies is difficult.
Which is Better?#
Neither is perfect. They are complementary tools.
- Use Intrinsic Valuation (DCF) when you want to know if a stock is a good long-term investment based on its own merits, regardless of market noise.
- Use Relative Valuation as a "sanity check." If your DCF says a stock is worth $100, but it trades at $50 and all its peers trade at $50, you might be missing a risk factor that the market sees.
Key Takeaways
- Intrinsic valuation (DCF) values a company like a landlord values rent (cash flow).
- Relative valuation values a company like a realtor values a house (comps).
- Intrinsic is better for long-term fundamental analysis but sensitive to assumptions.
- Relative is faster and market-based but can be misleading in bubbles.
- Smart investors use both to triangulate value.