Lesson 212 min

Intrinsic vs. Relative Valuation

Explore the two main schools of valuation: calculating intrinsic worth vs. comparing to peers.

Learning Objectives

  • Define Intrinsic Valuation (DCF)
  • Define Relative Valuation (Multiples)
  • Compare the pros and cons of each approach
  • Know when to use which method

Intrinsic vs. Relative Valuation#

There are two primary ways to determine what a company is worth. One looks inward at the company's cash generation, while the other looks outward at the market.

1. Intrinsic Valuation#

The Philosophy: An asset is worth the present value of the expected future cash flows it will generate.

The Primary Tool: Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis.

In this method, you don't care what the market thinks the stock is worth today. You build a model to forecast:

  1. How much cash the company will generate.
  2. How risky those cash flows are.
  3. What that cash is worth in today's dollars (Time Value of Money).

Analogy: The Rental Property#

You want to buy an apartment building. You don't look at Zillow to see what other buildings cost. Instead, you calculate:

  • Rent collected per month ($2,000)
  • Minus maintenance/taxes ($500)
  • = Net Cash ($1,500)
  • Value = The sum of that $1,500/month for the next 20 years. This is Intrinsic Valuation. You are valuing the cash, not the building.

Pros:

  • Forces you to understand the business drivers (margins, growth, risk).
  • Less influenced by market moods/bubbles.
  • Focuses on the long-term fundamentals.

Cons:

  • Highly sensitive to assumptions ("Garbage in, Garbage out").
  • Requires more time and effort.

2. Relative Valuation#

The Philosophy: An asset is worth what similar assets are trading for in the market.

The Primary Tool: Pricing Multiples (e.g., P/E Ratio, EV/EBITDA, P/Sales).

In this method, you look at "comparable" companies (peers). If Company A trades at 20x earnings and Company B is similar but trades at 10x earnings, Company B might be "relatively" undervalued.

Analogy: House Shopping with Comps#

You want to buy a house. You look at what the 3 neighbors sold their houses for last month.

  • Neighbor A (3 bed/2 bath): Sold for $400k.
  • Neighbor B (3 bed/2 bath): Sold for $410k.
  • Your Conclusion: This house is worth about $405k. This is Relative Valuation. You value the market price, not the cash flow.

Pros:

  • Quick and easy to calculate.
  • Reflects current market sentiment (useful for short-term trading).
  • Requires fewer assumptions.

Cons:

  • The "Bubble" Trap: If the whole neighborhood is overpriced (a housing bubble), relative valuation will tell you a house is "cheap" at $1M just because the neighbor sold for $1.1M. It won't tell you the house is intrinsically worthless.
  • Finding truly "comparable" companies is difficult.

Which is Better?#

Neither is perfect. They are complementary tools.

  • Use Intrinsic Valuation (DCF) when you want to know if a stock is a good long-term investment based on its own merits, regardless of market noise.
  • Use Relative Valuation as a "sanity check." If your DCF says a stock is worth $100, but it trades at $50 and all its peers trade at $50, you might be missing a risk factor that the market sees.

Key Takeaways

  • Intrinsic valuation (DCF) values a company like a landlord values rent (cash flow).
  • Relative valuation values a company like a realtor values a house (comps).
  • Intrinsic is better for long-term fundamental analysis but sensitive to assumptions.
  • Relative is faster and market-based but can be misleading in bubbles.
  • Smart investors use both to triangulate value.